What is the difference between MIT and Apache 2.0?

Both are permissive licenses. Apache 2.0 adds an explicit patent grant and patent retaliation clause, making it preferred for projects where patent risk is a concern.

When should I use GPL instead of MIT?

Use GPL if you want derivative works to also be open source (copyleft). MIT allows your code to be used in closed-source proprietary products.

Does the generated license text include my name and year?

Yes. You provide your name and the year, and the generator fills them into the correct places in the license text.

Best Free Open Source License Picker

Choosing the wrong open source license can limit how others use your project or create legal complications down the line. devtoolkit.sh's License Generator helps you pick the right license by explaining the key properties of each option — permissive versus copyleft, patent protection, distribution requirements — and then generates the complete license text with your name and year filled in. MIT, Apache 2.0, GPL v3, LGPL, MPL, BSD variants, and Creative Commons licenses are all covered. The result is ready to paste as your LICENSE file. This is an essential step when starting any open source project.

license textREADY

lines

0 chars1 lines

FAQ

What is the difference between MIT and Apache 2.0?: Both are permissive licenses. Apache 2.0 adds an explicit patent grant and patent retaliation clause, making it preferred for projects where patent risk is a concern.
When should I use GPL instead of MIT?: Use GPL if you want derivative works to also be open source (copyleft). MIT allows your code to be used in closed-source proprietary products.
Does the generated license text include my name and year?: Yes. You provide your name and the year, and the generator fills them into the correct places in the license text.